How to interpret VC feedback – standing out from the crowd
December 9, 2011 Leave a Comment
In my past I have been turned down by VCs many, many times. And while some of the VCs may not be so great at being a VC and not ‘get it’, for what I was pitching, it kind of didn’t matter. Overall if you speak to more than five investors and basically get the same result it ain’t them it’s you. But how do you know what ‘it’ is and figure out what to do about it? It is really hard for someone who is raising money to figure out how to interpret the feedback (explicit or implicit) received.
You can break down what it takes to get funding into three big buckets Team, Concept, Traction. Just about every question or discussion you had with an investor is evaluating at least one of these areas.
To get funded, you mostly need high marks on two of the three and ideally all three. And sometimes funding is a no-brainer. If you are already a successful entrepreneur you can probably get by with just having a team and are essentially ‘instantly fundable’. But most folks raising money don’t have a previous success.
The other ‘instantly fundable’ attribute is having big and growing traction. Mark Zuckerberg was able to raise his Series A from Accel Partners not because of the team, but because he had a pretty good concept and most important traction. Having great traction solves almost everything (except for maybe a small market) in order to get funded. And not just good traction, accelerating traction.
So assuming you are not a previously successful, repeat entrepreneur and don’t have accelerating traction, then it is basically a mix of the team, concept and traction that the VC is looking at.
With your product still in development (and likely without deep proprietary technology behind it) and traction several months away, it is all about evaluating the concept and the team. Interpreting all the messages that were sent by an investor can tell you how close you are. Do not be surprised if you are a lot further than you expect to be despite all the nice things the VC says to you (like ‘when you have a lead’ or ‘I’m very interested to track you guys as you see some results’).
So let’s start with the team starting with the founders. Attributes to look at include the technical background of the team. How much engineering experience is there on the team that knows how to ship a scalable product. Also, how much business acumen on the team to address acquisition and monetization elements of the strategy. Education and previous companies worked at play a role in experience, but at the end of the day an investor wants to know if they can trust the team to build something and get people using it.
One thing most first-time entrepreneurs don’t appreciate is that most other entrepreneurs are also really smart. Most have really top notch educations, strong technical backgrounds and some previous experience in a related field to what they are working on. The question that a VC is trying to answers is ‘Are you exceptional?’. The best (clichéd) analogy is American Idol. However, not during open auditions, but when the number of contestants has been narrowed down to a much smaller number like 20 or 30.
At that point everyone is a great singer. But what makes you have star potential even though you have never recorded an album before and not a professional singer? What makes the VC believe you have star potential?What crazy thing(s) have you done that most people would never do that shows you got something special? Did you start a business when you were 12 years old? Did you build a cool product on your own that solved a cool problem? The ‘exceptional’ usually involves some level of either incredible domain expertise that you were able to do something great with or demonstrating some form of salesmanship that accomplished something most people would never dream of even trying.
There are many things that could show that you are ‘exceptional’, but in reality most don’t.
Given the market the team is going after, how much domain expertise is there to understand the nuances associated with the target customer. Of course, more is better. Most thoughtful VCs can quickly ask a few questions to the founding team to see if the understand the basics and some subtleties associated with the market they are pursuing. In a consumer business, developing some consumer insights and understanding behaviors is critical. I can’t tell you how many times I have spoken to a startup who is developing a new product and has yet to talk to anyone who would be a target user.
At the end of the day, a VC is trying to understand if you know your stuff and do you have the passion and dedication to figure it out quickly.
A related element to evaluating the team is their ability to eloquently address the second big attribute VCs care about…the concept.
By concept I mean everything from ‘What is the problem being solved’ to the product experience, to proprietary technology, distribution to market potential. All that rolled into one. Like we used to say at Intuit…Is it a big unmet need, that you solve well and can you have a durable competitive advantage?
And then there are the other common questions: How will you get users/customers? How will you get them to come back? How often will they use it? How will you make money? Basically Acquisition/Distribution, Retention, Engagement and Monetization. Related to this is the network effects and scalability of your offering or model.
Do not underestimate the need to have convincing arguments for each of these elements. Without data around adoption of your product it is very possible that there are risks on several of these attributes. Each of these risks affects your fundability. This is where an investor can easily drill down and see how well you understand your business by asking questions about your metrics. Even if you don’t have any tangible numbers, you should know the benchmarks you will be compared to. Whether it is eCPM, DAU/MAU, CPA etc. a good knowledge of the key target metrics will demonstrate that you know your stuff. A red flag for an investor is if they know more about the metrics than you do.
Finally, one last attribute to consider is sex appeal. How hot a space are you pursuing? If you are working on a standalone web property versus a social, mobile, local (insert hot space name here) then you probably won’t be doing so great on the sizzle scale.
It is hard to get a term sheet from a venture capital firm. All you need to do is to look at the numbers of how many Series A investments any firm makes compared to how many startups are created annually. A longtime venture capitalist once told me that VCs are not risk takers. In fact they are exactly the opposite, they are risk eradicators. The more you have reduced each of the risk factors related to the team, concept and traction described above, the much higher the probability of closing a venture round. Do you have what it takes to be the next American Idol?